Oct 07 2008

The Giant, O’Brien

Published by Fence under Books

Author: Hilary Mantel
ISBN: 038525895X DDC: 823.914
See also: Library Thing ; Elsewhere ; RIP III

“Bring in the cows now. Time to shut up for the night”.
There came three cows, breathing in the near-dark: swishing with the tips of their tails, their bones showing through hide.

Image of The Giant O'BrienThis book isn’t labelled as horror; I’m guessing you are more likely to find it in the fiction or literary fiction section of a bookshop rather than the horror or even historical fiction section. But it fits under both. If you ask me.

The Giant of the title is based on the real life story of Charles Byrne but this is never intended to follow his life story. The real Byrne merely provides the inspiration. Along with the real John Hunter, real-life surgeon and anatomist. What Mantel does is use their stories as a jumping off point, an examination of the characters and their times. So of course it makes no pretence at being a real story.

Continue Reading »

Tags: 8 Stars, 823.914, based on true story, Britain - 1700s, Charles Byrne, England - 1700s, freak shows, Hilary Mantel, historical fiction, Ireland, Ireland - 1700s, John Hunter, London, RIP 3, RIP Challenge, The Giant O'Brien

Related posts

3 responses so far

Mar 28 2006

Alias Grace

Published by Fence under Books

DDC: 813.54
read with Historical Favorites
Author: Margaret Atwood

First line:
Out of the gravel there are peonies growing.

Based on the true story of Grace Marks, an infamous murderer in Canada in the 1840’s, Atwood’s book uses different narrators to tell the story, as well as interspersing the story with extracts from other works. From poems, fiction, newspapers of the time, and other sources. Although this is based on the real story, Atwood has, of course, fictionalised a great deal of the novel.

The two narrators are Grace herself, who tells her story in the first person, past tense, and Simon Jordan, the doctor investigating her claims of insanity or innocence. His parts are told by a third person narrator, and are in the present tense.

These shifts in perspective, combined with the extracts, give a wider sense of the story, as well as letting us get to know the characters, and not just from their own viewpoint. the also allow us to see how each truly views the other:

although like most gentlemen he often wants a thing to mean more than it does”

Grace herself comes across as a very self-contained woman, calm and prudish. She has been in prison and the asylum for many years, so maybe it is not surprising that she be slightly strange. But despite that fact that she tells her own story we are never given one truth. Grace herself doesn’t seem to know what happened, but is this true, or is she just fooling herself?

and she said I was a treasure and she hoped they would never let me out of prison, as she would like me always to be there to help her with her dresses- Which I suppose was a compliment of a sort

Simon is an almost perfect example of the outward respectability of life in the 1800’s, while his wandering thoughts allow us glimpses of darker thoughts.

This is a very readable, enjoyable book. Atwoods gives us some very descriptive passages eg Grace’s journey as a child traveling from Ireland to Canada. And these balance the slightly unknowable reality that lies behind the story.

Behind it is the graveyard, neat and green, the dead kept under firm control. No rambling weeds here, no tattered wreaths, no jumble and confusion; nothing like the baroque efflorescences of Europe. No angels, no Calvaries, no nonsense. heaven, for the Presbyterians, must resemble a banking establishment, with each soul tagged and docketed and placed in the appropriate pigeonhole.


Quotes:

It is always a mistake to curse back openly at those who are stronger than you unless there is a fence between

because once the horse was out of the stable it was no good shutting the barn door, and a woman once on her back was like a turtle in the same plight, she could scarcely turn herself right side up again, and was fair game for all”

The truth is that very few understand the truth about forgiveness. It is not the culprits who need to be forgiven; rather it is the victims, because they are the ones who cause all the trouble. If they were only less weak and careless, and more foresightful, and if they would keep from blunderinf into difficulties think of all the sorrow in the world that would be spared

Tags: 1840s, 813.54, 9 Stars, Alias Grace, based on true story, C19th, Canada, diary, excellent, first person narrator, Grace Marks, group read, Historical Favorites, historical fiction, Margaret Atwood, multiple narrators, murderer, reread

Related posts

2 responses so far

Feb 25 2006

Good Night, and Good Luck

Published by Fence under Moving Pictures

  • David Strathairn - Edward R. Murrow
  • Robert Downey Jr. - Joe Wershba
  • Patricia Clarkson - Shirley Wershba
  • Ray Wise - Don Hollenbeck
  • Frank Langella - William Paley
  • Jeff Daniels - Sig Mickelson

It is the 1950’s, and McCarthyism is rife in America as the hunt for reds under bed trundles on.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

In CBS Ed McMurrow begins to highlight McCarthy’s scare tactics and methods on his current affairs television show. The film is told both by the actors and by actual footage from the time. We get to see McCarthy, to hear his own words, and see the scaremongering of the time.

Shot in black and white it all looks great, but the film itself was simply too subdued to grab my attention. I have a feeling that this may be because of the mood I was in while watching it, but the low-key nature of everything simply served distance me as a viewer from what was going on. I also didn’t like the way the film seemed to stop every now and then to let us hear a song. There were maybe three of four from Dianne Reeves. They did sound lovely, and helped to create an atmosphere, but I just felt that they slowed the film down.

Despite these few problems this is a film worth watching. Strathairn is fantastic as McMorrow, and all the supporting cast do great jobs.

It also performs very neatly at alerting us to the present day situation, and how we can learn for the past. Yet at the same time there is no sense that this is hitting anyone over the head. You can see lessons for today if you wish, but no one is forcing you.

Clooney Studio | IMDb | Talking Pish | jFalstaff

Tags: 1950s, 7 Stars, based on true story, black and white, Cold War, David Strathairn, drama, Ed McMurrow, Frank Langella, Good Night and Good Luck, Jeff Daniels, McCarthyism, meeja, Patricia Clarkson, Ray Wise, Robert Downey Jr., USA - 1950s

Related posts

No responses yet

Feb 12 2006

Munich

Published by Fence under Moving Pictures

  • Eric Bana - Avner
  • Daniel Craig - Steve
  • Ciarán Hinds - Carl
  • Mathieu Kassovitz - Robert
  • Hanns Zischler - Hans

Based on the events that followed the terrorist attack on the Munich Olympic Games in 1972, this film has a lot of political baggage. There are those who see it as an example of anti-semitism. There are those who think it shows too much favour to the zionist cause. Whatever. Should it be examined based on topic, or on the quality of the film?

The film itself did keep my attention the whole way through. At just over 160 minutes it is a little long, but never overly so. Leaving aside the political discussions I thought the film did a good job of capturing Avner as a character. The rest of the team as less well-defined, but their roles re mosr of supporting and assisting Avner rather then as characters in their own right. That is not to say that they are uninteresting, or that they are 2D, just that their motivations and feelings are not given as much weight as Avners.

I thought that the story itself was well told; the tension surrounding the bombings/shhoting builds nicely. There is the mysterious French group to wonder about, and to help create a sense of paranoia and doubt.

As I said, their are those, on both sides, who will claim that this film is biased. But I don’t think it is. We are clearly shown the violence and random deaths portrayed by the Palestinian terrorists, we are shown the Israeli’s need to fight back and protect their home. It isn’t as though one side or the other is painted evil, though perhaps that is what some of the critics wanted?

The most telling scene in the film, for me, was the one between Avner and the PLO terrorist, where they discuss Israel. Avner, pretending to be a German socialist extremist of some description defends Israel, and its right to exist. And in the course of their discussion we see what it is that people really want. A home to call their own.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0408306/”>IMDb | Galactic Jack | Random Burblings | Screamer in the Matrix |

Tags: 1970s, 1972, 8 Stars, assassin, based on true story, Ciarán Hinds, Daniel Craig, drama, Eric Bana, Hanns Zischler, Mathieu Kassovitz, Munich, murder, terrorism

Related posts

No responses yet

Feb 10 2006

Walk The Line

Published by Fence under Moving Pictures, Music

  • Joaquin Phoenix - John R. Cash
  • Reese Witherspoon - June Carter
  • Ginnifer Goodwin - Vivian Cash
  • Robert Patrick - Ray Cash

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Almost everyone has heard of Johnny Cash. The “Man in Black” is famous for songs like Ring of Fire, Walk The Line, Don’t take your guns to town, I could go on. But I knew very little about Johnny Cash himself. I do have one of his “best of” albums, but I’m not what you call a huge fan.

Still, I like what I have heard of, and am a fan of Joaquin’s, and think that Reese Witherspoon is watchable, so I knew that I’d be going to see this film. And hoping it’d be good.

I wasn’t disappointed.
Walk The Line is just so very watchable. You got the pretty people, the great music, the wonderful story, and the tragic childhood. I know that there are comparisons being made with last year’s Ray but I didn’t se that, so can’t comment.

Phoenix is great in this role. He is John Cash. And I think that having him and Witherspoon sing the songs themselves was a great move. It adds so much to both of their performances.

The film starts off outside a prison. The camera moves in, and as it does we begin to hear the crowd chanting, and a band playing, the same few bars over and over again, as they, and everyone else waits for Cash to come out on stage.

Backstage, in the woodshop we get our first glimpse of Phoenix as Johnny Cash, and almost at once we flashback to his childhood. To working in the cotton fields with his family, listening to the radio, chatting with his older brother Jack. And then tragedy, as in an accident Jack dies, leaving J.R. (as he was called) feeling guilty for going fishing, not to mention hearing his father saying that the wrong son, the good son, died.

For the rest of the film this hangs over Cash. The audience isn’t hit over the head with it at every turn, but we are aware of it. And I wonder if the fact that Joaquin lost his older brother made his performance more intense.

It may be marketed as a bio of Johnny Cash, but for the most part this film is a love story. The story of Johnny and June. And it has all the highs and lows you’d expect, dealing as it does with divorce, drug-addiction and family tensions. But there is also a fair amount of humour thrown in there, along with more than a few stars who show up as characters.

Well worth watching.

IMDb | Official site | Confessions of a Movie Critic | Kimputer |

Tags: 8 Stars, based on true story, biography, Ginnifer Goodwin, Joaquin Phoenix, Johnny Cash, Reese Witherspoon, Robert Patrick, Walk The Line

Related posts

No responses yet

Feb 04 2006

Jarhead

Published by Fence under Moving Pictures

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

  • Jake Gyllenhaal - Swoff
  • Peter Sarsgaard - Troy
  • Jamie Foxx - Staff Sgt. Sykes
  • Lucas Black - Kruger

Jarhead is the story of one young Marine as he goes through training and then into Iraq during the early 90’s. It isn’t an overtly political film, although Kruger has a few interesting, if throwaway comments to make. It is a personal view of the war, and how war changes people/

As a film I don’t think that this was anything special. It was entertaining enough, but both Gyllenhaal and Sarsgaard are better than the film. The relationship between the pair is really what is at the heart of the film, the rest is simply the set-up.

And this is fairly understandable, considering that the film is based on the memoirs of Swofford. Of course as a film about war, and Iraq it does have a political message, if you want to see one. If you don’t you can ignore all that.

Continue Reading »

Tags: 7 Stars, based on book, based on true story, Iraq war, Jake Gyllenhaal, Jamie Foxx, Jarhead, Lucas Black, Peter Sarsgaard, soldier, War

Related posts

4 responses so far

Jan 16 2006

The Exorcism of Emily Rose

Published by Fence under Moving Pictures

  • Laura Linney …. Erin Bruner
  • Tom Wilkinson …. Father Moore
  • Campbell Scott …. Ethan Thomas
  • Jennifer Carpenter …. Emily Rose

Based on a true story The Exorcism of Emily Rose deals with the death of Emily Rose. Doctors said she was suffering from psychotic-epilepsy, her priest said it was possession. And because of Father Moore’s role in Emily’s refusal to take her medication, and her lack of medical attention he is put on trial for negligent homicide. Erin Bruner a high-profile lawyer takes his case because she wants to be made senior partener. Father Moore allows her represent him only after making her promise that he can take the stand and tell Emily’s story.

Continue Reading »

Tags: 5 Stars, baggage, based on true story, Campbell Scott, Emily Rose, exorcism, horror, Jennifer Carpenter, Laura Linney, religion, The Exorcism of Emily Rose, Tom Wilkinson

Related posts

No responses yet

Next »