Lady in the Water dir. by

17 August 2006

Cast: , , , , , ,
Rated :

Photobucket - Video and Image HostingThis is an odd film. A very odd film.

Ever since The Sixth Sense Shyamalan has been known as the “twist guy” for his film endings; I don’t think that is a fair description. And while you can say that Unbreakable, Signs and The Village all had twists to their endings, the twists weren’t all that important. The films were stories about people, truth, and finding out who you are. The Lady in the water continues in this vein, but at the same time it is a very different type of film. As Shyamalan has said, it is a bedtime story. A fairy tale, for children. So it is, of course, going to be more simplistic and yet at the same time it is more complicated than that.

Cleveland Heep is the superintendent at an apartment complex. But lately he has been having problems with the swimming pool. It seems that someone has been swimming after hours. And one night, after hearing splashes, he heads out to investigate. He slips, and falls into the pool, only to wake later in his home, with a strange young woman sitting near by. She pulled him out of the water, and although grateful, Heep doesn’t think it is proper that she spend too long with him. However as the night passes he comes to realize that she isn’t your average woman, she is a narf, a water nymph-like creature.

In this bedtime story narfs act as guides to people. But for thousands of years they have been unable to be heard. This narf, Story, is trying to contact a writer, with an important message. And so Heep decides to help her. In the process involving many of the complex’s residents. But also learning about the scrunts, creatures who will do anything to stop the narf.

I’m still not quite sure what I think about this film. I found the beginning a little slow, but that might have been my annoyance at the audience I was with as they seemed to think they were at a comedy and wanted to laugh at everything. Once the film got going however they shut up, and although there was more laughter, it was at appropriate scenes, not simply because they were bored.

There is a nice blend of humour, drama and the odd scare. The constant references to war in the background were maybe a little over the top, but they served a purpose in highlighting the mission and importance of the narf, so I suppose they were necessary. I really enjoyed the character of the film critic, and the little twists and turns that the film and characters took. Plus the scrunt was great. Maybe the special effects weren’t all that special, but the creature design itself was great. And overall the scrunt succeeded in being a menacing, dangerous creature.

He’s hearing the voice of God through a crossword puzzle!

Surprisingly funny in parts I think I’ll have to go see it again, because its nature makes this film a little hard to “get” right from the outset. Whimsical and odd, I’d have to recommend it. I’m not sure about Shyamalan’s names though, narf is little Pinky and the Brain for me. Scrunt is okay, not great though. Although I did like Tartutic.

IMDb | Official Site | DarkMatters | Stainless Steel Droppings | Marginal Revolution | Cinemarati Discussion

You may also like...

3 Responses

  1. Carl V. says:

    The names are a little silly but I am assuming that those are the names he originally made up for his daughters and if so I can't imagine him wanting to change them for the film audience…sure it would disappoint his kids. Despite the critics hating it I read recently that his kids love it and have already seen it multiple times so in that he succeeded. I really like it, thought it was quite fun, and look forward to seeing it again when it comes out on DVD.

  2. Fence says:

    Yeah, a lot of the film makes more sense when you think of it as being for his children rather than for a more general audience. It still works, and I still enjoyed it. I'm glad his children liked it so much.

  3. Carl V. says:

    Wasn't Paul Giamatti excellent…I have enjoyed him in everything I've seen him in lately.