Aug 22 2006

A Scanner Darkly

Published by Fence under Moving Pictures

Writ & dir. Richard Linklater
Based on the novel by Philip K. Dick

  • Keanu Reeves - Bob Arctor
  • Robert Downey Jr. - James Barris
  • Winona RyderDonna
  • Woody Harrelson - Ernie Luckman
  • Rory Cochrane- Charles Freck

Image Hosted by ImageShack.usI have come to conclusion that I dislike this new animation style of digital-rotoscoping. That is where actors are filmed and then converted into animation using some computer aided magic. (As you can see I am all up on the technical terms) The previous film in this style I saw was Renaissance, which suffered from a boring plot, but also just left me a bit cold, despite looking great on occasion.

And here, in A Scanner Darkly, it does look interesting. The opening scene of drug induced visions of bugs crawling all over one’s body. That was great. And a few other scenes als caught my attention. But overall this style just doesn’t work for me. It is almost as though this mixture of animation and acting erradicates the best of both. Perhaps this is because it is a relatively new technique? I’m just not sure.

Anyways, apart from the medium, the film itself is very watchable. Plenty of drug paranoia, not to mention drugged out conversations. The plot revolves around Keanu Reeves character, Bob Arctor, or possibly Fred. Fred is his codename, what he goes by when reporting to his police department. Arctor is his undercover alias, a drug taking, small time crook. But he is so deep undercover that he is actually ordered to spy on himself. No one in the police really know what he looks like as he wears a suit that disguises him constantly by shifting what he looks like. Flickering through different appearances, and parts of appearances so that he may have half the face of a blonde woman, the arm of a man, and the feet of someone else entirely.

But to be honest, the plot didn’t really engage me all that much. Possibly because I don’t have a real feel for this animation, which makes it hard to get into the story. But also because there is a constant sense that nothing is what it seems, and you shouldn’t take anything at face value.

Overall though, it is worth going to see purely for the dialogue and humour, which although dark and sombre is also occasionally hilarious. The discussion regarding the bycycle and the orphaned gears is not one to be missed.

There is of course also the deeper meaning behind this film; the damage drugs are doing to people, the surveillance culture, the erosion of civil liberties. All quite depressing subjects, but handled well. There is even a possibility of hope in the final scene, although that is really up to the viewer to decide.

All in all there is plenty to entertain, but I wouldn’t be in a rush to see this above anything else.

IMDb | Through the Scary Door | Movie Guff | Confessions of a film critic

5 responses so far

Jul 10 2006

The Lake House

Published by Fence under Moving Pictures

Dir: Alejandro Agresti
Writ: David Auburn
Jiro Asada(original Novella Siworae); Eun-Jeong Kim & Ji-na Yeo (writers of original film Siworae aka ]Il Mare)

  • Keanu Reeves - Alex Wyler
  • Sandra Bullock - Kate Forster
  • Shohreh Aghdashloo - Anna Klyczynski
  • Christopher Plummer - Simon Wyler
  • Ebon Moss-Bachrach - Henry Wyler
  • Willeke van Ammelrooy - Kate’s Mother

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.usI didn’t think I’d enjoy this film. When I first heard about it I didn’t think I’d bother to go see, but then I read some reviews that persuaded me to check it out. I still didn’t think I’d enjoy it mind, but I thought I’d give it a go.

The basic plot revolves around a house, yes by a lake, hence The Lake House, and its mailbox. Which seems to be somesort of a time-portal type thing, allowing Kate and Alex to exchange letters. From a distance of two years. Kate is in 2006, Alex in 2004.

Despite my reservations there is actually quite a bit to like about this film. Reeves and Bullock have good chemistry, and the script has a lot of nice touches in the dialogue. However I didn’t like the way the letters the two characters were translated into total conversations, with one replying to a sentence and then the other responding as though they were able to talk in real time. It wasn’t a mysterious Instant Messaging time device they used. It was letters. But I was willing to over look that.

What I’m not willing to over look Show Spoilers ▼

So in the end I came out feeling annoyed. I’m glad I went, and overall it was a watchable film. But I didn’t like it.

IMDb | Official Site | Stainless Steel Droppings | Estella’s Revenge (scroll down) | Daring Young Mom |

9 responses so far

Nov 17 2005

Thumbsucker

Published by Fence under Moving Pictures

  • Lou Taylor Pucci …. Justin Cobb
  • Tilda Swinton …. Audrey Cobb
  • Vincent D’Onofrio …. Mike Cobb
  • Vince Vaughn …. Mr. Geary
  • Keanu Reeves …. Perry Lyman

I’m not sure exactly how to review this film. I enjoyed it while watching, it is humourous and fun, but it is also a bit odd, and by giving away details I may ruin your enjoyment.

The film revolves around the Cobb family[1] Justin in particular. He is the thumbsucker of the title, and because he a teenage there are quite a few people who would like him to take his thumb out of his mouth for good.

I suppose it is a coming of age film, although we don’t really get any solutions, that is the point. There are no real answers to life, we just live. Doesn’t mean we have to stop asking, just that we are never going to come up with one definitive answer.

Linknotes:
  1. but no Jayne

No responses yet