Jul 17 2007

Week 232

Published by Fence under Family, Weekly memes

It may be Tues, but on Sun Luna Nina said:

  1. Situation ::
  2. Theme song ::
  3. Kelly ::
  4. Club ::
  5. Swerve ::
  6. Couch ::
  7. Bigfoot ::
  8. Arbitrary ::
  9. Inventor ::
  10. Blazer ::

mine’ll be under the cut

And now, time for catch up

Went to Sligo in Friday. Took de sister to Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix on Sat. It was good. Went to watch B#5 play football. We won. Sun was the Granny’s one year anniversary so we had mass and a visit to the grave and decades of the rosary. Then a meal with many of the extended family. I’d arranged to have Mon and Tues off work, so I travelled today and tomorrow get to relax and shop, and maybe tidy my room like I planned to do last week but totally didn’t.

Continue Reading »

Tags: De Sister, Family, Luna Nina, Sligo

Related posts

4 responses so far

Sep 10 2006

Little Miss Sunshine

Published by Fence under Moving Pictures

Dir: Jonathan Dayton & Valerie Faris
Writ: Michael Arndt

  • Abigail Breslin - Olive
  • Greg Kinnear - Richard
  • Paul Dano - Dwayne
  • Alan Arkin - Grandpa
  • Toni Collette - Sheryl
  • Steve Carell - Frank

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.usFamilies are a source of much amusement and not a little tragedy. Especially when your father is a motivational speaker, whose “9 steps to winning� doesn’t seem to be working, your uncle is an attempted suicide, and your brother is a wannabe fighter pilot who has taken a vow of silence and so hasn’t spoken in months. Not to mention a heroin snorting grandfather. Not exactly the most functional of families. But when Olive, a little girl who dreams of winning beauty pageants, gets a chance to compete for the Little Miss Sunshine title, the entire family is forced into helping her achieve her dream.

I don’t want to give away too much about this film. In a way the plot isn’t really important. Instead it is the characters that are important. Their relationships with one another, and their quirks and faults.

I really enjoyed this film, it is funny and moving at the same time. Yes every now and then things get a little too “kooky�, but at the same time it all works. The humour is great, one-liners and visual gags. The situations are somewhat forced, but it doesn’t really matter. It all works.

There is also a satirical aspect to the film, but it isn’t particularly cutting satire, it is all good humoured and just plain nice. On the surface it seems as though it going to be a dark comedy, but although there is death, and suicide, and even a hint of paedophilia, but it isn’t dark. Not really. It is too good natured and feel good to be dark in the strictest sense. It takes the middle ground, but it isn’t a middle of the road film.

I enjoyed every moment of Little Miss Sunshine; from the out and out funny moments to the touching, moving moments. Highly recommended.

IMDb | Inside Pulse | jane dark’s sugarhigh

Tags: 8 Stars, Abigail Breslin, Alan Arkin, beauty pagent, comedy, Family, fun, Greg Kinnear, humour, Jonathan Dayton, Little Miss Sunshine, Michael Arndt, moving, Paul Dano, Steve Carell, Toni Collette, touching, Valerie Faris

Related posts

9 responses so far

Apr 25 2006

Paul O’Connell sleeps with the lights on because the dark is afraid of him

Published by Fence under Family, Sport

Edited to add For all your Munster Rugby Facts, 100% true[1] all the time.

Sunday morning dawned with blue skies and a trip to the christening. Then the aftermath and the chatting, the ooohing and awwing over the baby. But as the clock got closer and closer to 3 the boys began to look at their watches. The telly in the kitchen went on. There was a half argument over whether the build up to the match should be shown, or whether B#3 would be allowed to watch some of the Grand Prix. He had a bet on you see.

But at around 2.45, laden down with cheesecakes and sandwiches we all headed for the cars. There were two loads of us, and only a limited number of seats at home, so I told the mother to facking floor[2] it, but she didn’t. Luckily the father was still messing about with his camera so we made it back before the larger car, and nabbed some good seats.

And for all my dithering over what team I was going to support, once the match started there was no doubt. My head may have been wondering, but the rest of me said Munster.

Even before the second car had arrived Munster were three points up, and from there on there was no real doubt about the outcome. The Munster forwards were simply fantastic.

It was billed as a “clash of cultures” in some of the papers, and while that is certainly an exaggeration there was a sense that although these teams know each other so very well, have played together on so many great occasions, have been willing to, as Paul O’Connell put it, die for each other, they were stereotyped as opposites

Leinster versus Munster has been reduced to country against town, Barry’s tea against café latte, ale against champagne. Munster are perceived as being about blood and thunder and apocalyptic skies, trundling around rugby fields in one, indistinguishable red mass. Leinster, though, are a bunch of amorous Frenchmen with south Dublin accents pirouetting around the field at 100 miles an hour, all the better to showcase their Byronesque hairdos.

Paul O’Connell, man of the match, man of the tournament. Who doesn’t have a grá for Paul? Brian O’Driscoll may get all the press, but it isn’t the Leinster captain that we all adore. We may respect him, we may think he is the best rugby player Ireland has produced, we may admire him. But he just doesn’t have that place in rugby hearts that O’Connell does. A place cemented not only by his displays on the pitch, but his attitude off. He gave a lovely interview just after the match.
And then there is O’Gara. You’d have to feel some sympathy for Contepomi, his opposite number who made quite a few mistakes, but O’Gara was superb, and none more deserving of scoring that wonderful try. And it was a great sight to see him leap over the hoardings, running straight for the red army faithful.

“If I could turn back the clock, I wouldn’t do it again.” O’Gara reflected on of his soccer like celebration.

“But your emotions get the better of you at times, and, if I can’t enjoy that, I won’t ever enjoy any moment I’ve had. I couldn’t believe there wasn’t a second line, and I was through.

“I could just see a sea of red in front of me and that gave me an incredible buzz.”

Although I’ll confess that when I say him jump I thought to myself, he’s going to tap an ankle and go flying, and then where’ll you be against Biarritz? But he didn’t, and for a fella just out of hospital, with boots that were too small for him, and a cut opening up didn’t he do well :)
And then there’s Stringer. And O’Callaghan. And poor John Kelly who went off injured, replaced by Rob Hernderson, who also had to be carried off injured before the game was over.

So congratulations to Munster. But you’d have to feel for Leinster. After their fantastic display against Toulouse they go and lose the bragging rights for the next year. I’m sure they’ll be back, better than ever for next year’s competition, but for now, has anyone got any spare tickets for Cardiff?

And I just have to end with a comment from George Hook. He was talking just before the match started about how little the Munster coach, Declan Kidney, gives away in press conferences, and said “If you lined 100 Kidneys up, you still wouldn’t reach a conclusion.

Final score in the European Rugby Cup semi-final was Leinster 6, Munster 30. And while Munster did dominate, and boss Leinster around a little, I think that final score is a little flattering to Munster. Which I’m sure they know.

Linknotes:
  1. for a certain value of true
  2. I have no idea where this is from, possibly a Tommy Tiernan gig, but the brothers say it regularly so now, so do I. Dublin to Cork in 30 minutes boys, I faking floored it
Tags: Brian O'Driscoll, christening, Donncha O'Callaghan, Family, HeinekenCup06, John Kelly, Leinster, Marcus Horing, Munster, Munster V Leinster, Paul O'Connell, Peter Stringer, Philppe Contempomi, Ronan O'Gara, rugby

Related posts

7 responses so far

Feb 02 2006

Well, I saw myself in more of a … patriarchal sort of role. You know, lots of pointing and scowling.

Published by Fence under Irishify, Ramblings

So there is a bit of a debate between Fiona from Mental Meanderings and United Irelander at, wel, United Irelander over an article written by Ronan Mullen in The Examiner. The article in question has to do with marriage, and gay rights, and conventional marriage and all that sort of stuff.

But while I was over at UI’s I started to wonder what exactly is a family?

Mullen says that a traditional marriage works best, that children raised by a mother and a father fair better.

There is a wealth of information and analysis out there to show that children do better with the traditional family model. That children should ideally enjoy the society of their biological father and biological mother throughout their formative years should not be seen as an outdated concept when study after study is bearing it out.

But you know what? This traditional family that is being mentioned, it isn’t really all that traditional at all. Does the average family of today resemble the family of 100 years ago? Or even 50?

Maybe on a superficial level, but is it the norm for the father to work, and the mother to stay at home, minding the kids, totally dependent on her spouse for everything?

Is it still okay for a man to demand his conjugal rights?

Are fathers still expectd to play no real role apart from that of enforcing discipline in the family?

After all those are all traditional values too aren’t they? Tradition doesn’t mean right, doesn’t even mean a good way to do things. All it means is that this is the way previous generations have done things.

But if you look closer you’ll see that maybe the previous few generations have acted that way, but before that things were different. It used to be traditional for three generations to live in the one house. In some cultures it is traditional for parents to arrange marriages.

As far as I’m concerned the limiting the definition of what a family is to the modern nuclear family is pointlessly restrictive. What about aunts, uncles, cousins, the extended family?
Family is what you make it. And that means you can’t legislate what a family is, and you certainly can’t legislate what a family isn’t.

Which brings me on to marriage, and what exactly marriage is for.

Is it a public declaration of love and faithfulness between two people? Or is it simply a legal way of ensuring who next of kin is, and all the rights married couples get? Or is it to provide a partnership to bring up children?

And no matter what your answer, why exactly does the sex of the people matter?

And, most important of all, why do I keep typing marraige when I mean marriage?

So many questions, I look forward to your answers.

ETA: participants in the debate: Progressive Ireland | Disullusioned Lefty | Sicilian Notes | For All We Know | Realitycheck(dot)ie

Tags: Blogland, debate, Family, gay rights, traditions

Related posts

8 responses so far