Comments on: Spiderman 3 http://www.susanhatedliterature.net/2007/05/13/spiderman-3/ She'd much prefer to read a good book Thu, 08 Jan 2009 12:37:47 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: Fence http://www.susanhatedliterature.net/2007/05/13/spiderman-3/#comment-13300 Fence Wed, 16 May 2007 21:19:26 +0000 http://www.susanhatedliterature.net/2007/05/13/spiderman-3/#comment-13300 Kindof a pity, isn't it Carl? Wonder if they'll make a 4th, cause I know the box office was quite good. Different horse for different course H :) Ann I'll forgive you for not visiting. I know you've been busy. Kindof a pity, isn’t it Carl? Wonder if they’ll make a 4th, cause I know the box office was quite good.

Different horse for different course H :)

Ann I’ll forgive you for not visiting. I know you’ve been busy.

]]> By: Ann http://www.susanhatedliterature.net/2007/05/13/spiderman-3/#comment-13298 Ann Wed, 16 May 2007 20:45:49 +0000 http://www.susanhatedliterature.net/2007/05/13/spiderman-3/#comment-13298 I agree 1000% with this review. That movie was 3 hours of my life wasted. I was never keen on Spiderman but was actually won over by the first 2 films. This one made me want to gouge my eyes out. Haven't been blog-reading in a while, but I love your new look. (I know it's probably not that new anymore - but it's new to me after all.) I agree 1000% with this review. That movie was 3 hours of my life wasted. I was never keen on Spiderman but was actually won over by the first 2 films. This one made me want to gouge my eyes out.

Haven’t been blog-reading in a while, but I love your new look. (I know it’s probably not that new anymore - but it’s new to me after all.)

]]> By: Harlequin http://www.susanhatedliterature.net/2007/05/13/spiderman-3/#comment-13297 Harlequin Wed, 16 May 2007 18:00:09 +0000 http://www.susanhatedliterature.net/2007/05/13/spiderman-3/#comment-13297 Nothing. Nothing nothing nothing. Bleccch. Nothing. Nothing nothing nothing. Bleccch.

]]> By: Carl V. http://www.susanhatedliterature.net/2007/05/13/spiderman-3/#comment-13296 Carl V. Wed, 16 May 2007 17:44:13 +0000 http://www.susanhatedliterature.net/2007/05/13/spiderman-3/#comment-13296 Really enjoyed 1 and 2. As for your assessment of 3: Amen!!! Really enjoyed 1 and 2. As for your assessment of 3: Amen!!!

]]> By: Fence http://www.susanhatedliterature.net/2007/05/13/spiderman-3/#comment-13289 Fence Tue, 15 May 2007 20:52:54 +0000 http://www.susanhatedliterature.net/2007/05/13/spiderman-3/#comment-13289 Dianna, I have to say that Franco does nothing at all for me. Nothing. But then again, more than anyone else in this film. Dianna, I have to say that Franco does nothing at all for me. Nothing. But then again, more than anyone else in this film.

]]> By: Dianna Trent http://www.susanhatedliterature.net/2007/05/13/spiderman-3/#comment-13286 Dianna Trent Tue, 15 May 2007 17:04:36 +0000 http://www.susanhatedliterature.net/2007/05/13/spiderman-3/#comment-13286 I agree that there was waaaaaaaay too much going on in this film! It was dizzying to say the least! I also don't know why Peter Parker didn't freak without his mask! Soooooo many people saw him without it! BTW, that was Miss Dunst's REAL voice singing! I think we all know why she lost her job on broadway now! That Topher kid was funny but I don't care for Venom. And why wasn't his name mentioned in the film?! As for the wooden T.H. Church, I liked him MUCH better in the tv sitcom WINGS. Sandman was scarey! (IMO) It's HARRY who stole the show! I don't think there's a woman alive who will EVER get enough of his 'soooo good pie' & 'strawberries' line! I must say, he can play "deranged" effortlessly! - Dianna I agree that there was waaaaaaaay too much going on in this film!
It was dizzying to say the least! I also don’t know why Peter Parker didn’t freak without his mask! Soooooo many people saw him without it! BTW, that was Miss Dunst’s REAL voice singing! I think we all know why she lost her job on broadway now! That Topher kid was funny but I don’t care for Venom. And why wasn’t his name mentioned in the film?! As for the wooden T.H. Church, I liked him MUCH better in the tv sitcom WINGS. Sandman was scarey! (IMO)

It’s HARRY who stole the show! I don’t think there’s a woman alive who will EVER get enough of his ’soooo good pie’ & ’strawberries’ line! I must say, he can play “deranged” effortlessly!

- Dianna

]]> By: Fence http://www.susanhatedliterature.net/2007/05/13/spiderman-3/#comment-13281 Fence Tue, 15 May 2007 09:51:05 +0000 http://www.susanhatedliterature.net/2007/05/13/spiderman-3/#comment-13281 I'm not a huge comics fan, thought I have read and enjoyed a few, but I agree that one, or even three, films can never match the characterisation you get in a long series. That is why, whenever I see a film based on a book, I always try and forget everything about the previous incarnations. It doesn't always work, but I try I’m not a huge comics fan, thought I have read and enjoyed a few, but I agree that one, or even three, films can never match the characterisation you get in a long series. That is why, whenever I see a film based on a book, I always try and forget everything about the previous incarnations. It doesn’t always work, but I try

]]> By: Sir Jorge http://www.susanhatedliterature.net/2007/05/13/spiderman-3/#comment-13276 Sir Jorge Mon, 14 May 2007 17:30:45 +0000 http://www.susanhatedliterature.net/2007/05/13/spiderman-3/#comment-13276 I still haven't seen it, but everyone seems to resound mixed reviews. I'm a big comic book fan, and I do not believe that these general audience pictures really depict the character like a long on-going series can. So it'll always be a let down on many levels. I still haven’t seen it, but everyone seems to resound mixed reviews.

I’m a big comic book fan, and I do not believe that these general audience pictures really depict the character like a long on-going series can. So it’ll always be a let down on many levels.

]]> By: Fence http://www.susanhatedliterature.net/2007/05/13/spiderman-3/#comment-13270 Fence Mon, 14 May 2007 08:42:58 +0000 http://www.susanhatedliterature.net/2007/05/13/spiderman-3/#comment-13270 Way too much Alan, and yet, not enough. Blueeyes I liked Maguire in 2. But in this, I dunno, he just didn't work. And I can't be the only person thinking "he looks just like Frodo" when he was trying to rescue the ring. I know H. I know. Ned was meh. Didn't have that much to do. A lot more muscles on him than usual though. Heather Anne, they shoulda just done the Venom baddie. All the others were too conflicted over their evilness. Which sometimes can be a good thing, but in S3 it just made them into not-evil-villians Way too much Alan, and yet, not enough.

Blueeyes I liked Maguire in 2. But in this, I dunno, he just didn’t work. And I can’t be the only person thinking “he looks just like Frodo” when he was trying to rescue the ring.

I know H. I know.
Ned was meh. Didn’t have that much to do. A lot more muscles on him than usual though.

Heather Anne, they shoulda just done the Venom baddie. All the others were too conflicted over their evilness. Which sometimes can be a good thing, but in S3 it just made them into not-evil-villians

]]> By: heather anne http://www.susanhatedliterature.net/2007/05/13/spiderman-3/#comment-13267 heather anne Mon, 14 May 2007 02:42:03 +0000 http://www.susanhatedliterature.net/2007/05/13/spiderman-3/#comment-13267 Yup, right on. The first one was solid. The second one was better. But this one just lacked the soul and charm of the others. There was no really good villain, either. And everyone knows you can't have a good superhero movie without a seriously evil villain! Yup, right on. The first one was solid. The second one was better. But this one just lacked the soul and charm of the others. There was no really good villain, either. And everyone knows you can’t have a good superhero movie without a seriously evil villain!

]]>