12
Feb

Blood and Chocolate

   Posted by: Fence   in Moving Pictures

Dir: Katja von Garnier
Writ: Ehren Kruger, Christopher Landon; original novel by Annette Curtis Klause

  • Agnes Bruckner - Vivian
  • Hugh Dancy - Aiden
  • Olivier Martinez - Gabriel
  • Katja Riemann - Astrid
  • Bryan Dick - Rafe

Image Hosted by ImageShack.usFrom the people who brought us Underworld so I hope you are not expecting the best film in the world here? To be honest this film does exactly what it says on the tin. It is a supernatural horror love story, based on a novel for “young adults”, although from the wikipedia article it seems as though there were quite a few changes made to the book’s plot.

The film revolves around Vivian; who some believe to be the girl from the prophecy, the one who will lead the loup-garoux into a new dawn. Or something like that. Loup-garoux being the term used for these Romanian werewolves. Everyone also believes that the pack leader, Gabriel, will choose Vivian to be his next mate. For some reason the pack rules say he has a new mate every 7 years. Why this is is never explained.

And of course, as is usual in these types of films, the love story is a sort of Romeo and Juliet affair, resulting in death and violence.

In a lot of places the dialogue is cheesy, and the effects aren’t all that great, plus the plot is fairly nonsensical. But the film isn’t terrible. It is merely meh, although I did like the fact that these werewolves become actual wolves, and real wolves were used in the film. And some of the film looked quite good. So a meh-film, made a little better by a tenny little bit of style. But I can’t really recommend it to anyone.

IMDb | Official Site | Stainless Steel Droppings | Slant | Sex and the Single Movie Critic

Tags: 5 Stars, Agnes Brucknew, Annetter Curtis Klause, based on book, Blood and Chocolate, Bryan Cick, Christopher Landon, Ehren Kruger, horror, Hugh Cancy, Katja Riemann, Katja von Garnier, loup-garoux, meh, Olivier Martinez, romance, Romeo and Juliet, sff, stylish, werewolves

Related posts

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

This entry was posted on Monday, February 12th, 2007 at 10:26 am and is filed under Moving Pictures. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

2 comments so far

 1 
MyAvatars 0.2

Despite the dig at Underworld, both of which I think are really good films in their genre, I pretty much agree with your assessment. I might have enjoyed it a smidge more but not much. It was exactly what I expected with a few pleasant surprises (the real wolves, the beautiful old buildings) that made it an enjoyable experience for me. It is very telling that it wasn’t a very well done film overall in that it lasted only 1 week in most of the theatres here in town.

Rate this:
2.5
February 20th, 2007 at 6:19 pm
 2 
MyAvatars 0.2

Aw Carl, I did enjoy the Underworld films, but they weren’t the best in the world.

Rate this:
2.5
February 21st, 2007 at 11:32 am

Leave a reply

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment