<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blood and Chocolate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.susanhatedliterature.net/2007/02/12/blood-and-chocolate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.susanhatedliterature.net/2007/02/12/blood-and-chocolate/</link>
	<description>She'd much prefer to read a good book</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 20:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fence</title>
		<link>http://www.susanhatedliterature.net/2007/02/12/blood-and-chocolate/#comment-4741</link>
		<dc:creator>Fence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 10:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.susanhatedliterature.net/blood-and-chocolate/#comment-4741</guid>
		<description>Aw Carl, I did enjoy the Underworld films, but they weren't the best in the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aw Carl, I did enjoy the Underworld films, but they weren&#8217;t the best in the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl V.</title>
		<link>http://www.susanhatedliterature.net/2007/02/12/blood-and-chocolate/#comment-4702</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl V.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.susanhatedliterature.net/blood-and-chocolate/#comment-4702</guid>
		<description>Despite the dig at Underworld, both of which I think are really good films in their genre, I pretty much agree with your assessment.  I might have enjoyed it a smidge more but not much.  It was exactly what I expected with a few pleasant surprises (the real wolves, the beautiful old buildings) that made it an enjoyable experience for me.  It is very telling that it wasn't a very well done film overall in that it lasted only 1 week in most of the theatres here in town.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite the dig at Underworld, both of which I think are really good films in their genre, I pretty much agree with your assessment.  I might have enjoyed it a smidge more but not much.  It was exactly what I expected with a few pleasant surprises (the real wolves, the beautiful old buildings) that made it an enjoyable experience for me.  It is very telling that it wasn&#8217;t a very well done film overall in that it lasted only 1 week in most of the theatres here in town.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
