I was shocked to read this article in today’s Irish Times. I mean, television viewers making sense! What’s that all about? A shocking and horrifing new development if you ask me.

Those interviewed found depiction of a graphic rape scene more acceptable as part of a detective drama than in a soap opera, for example

And this belief that violence is more acceptable for adults than for children! Where did such reason come from. Won’t someone think of the children. Oh, hang on, they are. Because, and this really is an inciteful finding,

issues of violence, sex or coarse language were more acceptable for late-night broadcasting.

Since when did common sense become so rare that an example of it makes the papers?

And in a totally unrelated issue was out at the pub last night, and one of the usual discussions came up. You know the whole unemployment rate in France [1] and the fact that Irish people do enjoy using their credit cards, and getting massively into debt, because, lets face it, unless you use real hard cash then you really aren’t spending any money now are you. But that is not what I want to type about now. Oh no. A far more valuable discussion occured.

One concerning The List, you know the top five fella’s[2] that are pure sex on legs. Only I could only come up with three. Sure there were other names hovering, but they just weren’t, you know, top five material. I did have a list of five before, and while Brad Pitt and David Boreanaz are still “all that” are they still top five?

    My list of three in no particular order

  • Adam Baldwin
  • Sean Bean
  • Keifer Sutherland

So I need another two…. Vince Vaughn maybe. Suggestions?

Linknotes:
  1. Is it really at 10% Anne?
  2. or whatever sex you are into
Tags: common sense, shocked!, The Irish Times

Related posts

Tags: , ,

This entry was posted on Thursday, November 3rd, 2005 at 4:51 pm and is filed under Current Affairs, TV. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

9 comments so far

 1 
MyAvatars 0.2

I think I’ll pass on suggestions for the ’sex on legs’ list :)
And I agree with you on your comments about the article…tis shocking that common sense and television viewing would ever come together!

Rate this:
2.5
November 3rd, 2005 at 7:54 pm
 2 
MyAvatars 0.2

Ah..see…I misread your blog and didn’t catch the ‘or whatever sex you are into’ footnote so, despite it being hard to limit the list to 5, here’s who I currently think are my female “sex on legs” in no particular order.

Sara Evans
Shania Twain
Jewel Staite
Morena Baccarin
Scarlett Johansson

Rate this:
2.5
November 3rd, 2005 at 8:09 pm
 3 
MyAvatars 0.2

Off the top of my head, in no particular order:

1. Josh Holloway (Sawyer in ‘Lost’)
2. Ben Browder (Crichton in ‘Farscape’)
3. Hugh Jackman (Wolverine)
4. Viggo Mortensen (as Aragorn in LOTR)
5. Sean Bean (as Sharpe)

Rate this:
2.5
November 3rd, 2005 at 9:52 pm
 4 
MyAvatars 0.2

Shania Twain and no Monica Belluci Carl?

Weenie I do like Sawyer and his greasy sexiness, but he wouldn’t make the list. Viggo would’ve but then I say him in History of Violence. Hugh Jackman - yes. Added.

Rate this:
2.5
November 3rd, 2005 at 11:51 pm
 5 
MyAvatars 0.2

‘Tis indeed. But that’s no discussion for a night in the pub, young lady.
Sex on legs, now that is suitable. No idea. Too early in the day…

Rate this:
2.5
November 4th, 2005 at 9:29 am
 6 
MyAvatars 0.2

Economics is a great topic for the pub, just like politics and religion.

But I’d agree, sex on legs discussions are much better

Rate this:
2.5
November 4th, 2005 at 11:38 am
 7 
MyAvatars 0.2

I vote Viggo Mortensen all the way. Yum! Also agree with Sean Bean and Kiefer. Adam is okay I guess. I like Vince less now that he seems to have hooked up with Jennifer Aniston. And I have a weird soft spot in my heart for Zack Braff. I’m weird.

Rate this:
2.5
November 4th, 2005 at 4:29 pm
 8 
MyAvatars 0.2

Zach is cute, but not sexy :)

Rate this:
2.5
November 4th, 2005 at 4:31 pm
 9 
MyAvatars 0.2

Ah, to each his own ;)

Rate this:
2.5
November 4th, 2005 at 7:52 pm

Leave a reply

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment